Discussion:
Gun Use Research
(too old to reply)
raykeller
2015-12-14 02:36:16 UTC
Permalink
Gun Use Research
Â
In 1865, a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United
States.
Â
In 1881, a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the
United States - who later died from the wound.
Â
In 1963, a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy,
President of the United States.
Â
In 1975, a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President
of the United States.
Â
In 1983, a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan, President of
the United States.
Â
In 1984, James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 22 people in
a McDonalds restaurant.
Â
In 1986, Patrick Sherrill, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 15 people
in an Oklahoma post office.
Â
In 1990, James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 10 people at a
GMAC office.
Â
In 1991, George Hennard, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 23 people
in a Luby's cafeteria in Killeen, TX.
Â
In 1995, James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 5
coworkers in a Texas laboratory.
Â
In 1999, Larry Asbrook, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 8 people at
a church service.
Â
In 2001, a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a
failed attempt to kill President George W. Bush.
Â
In 2003, Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people
at a Lockheed-Martin plant.
Â
In 2007, a registered Democrat named Seung-Hui Cho, shot and killed 32
people at Virginia Tech.
Â
In 2010, a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner, shot
Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.
Â
In 2011, a registered Democrat named James Holmes, went into a movie theater
and shot and killed 12 people.
Â
In 2012, Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7
people in Minneapolis.
Â
In 2013, a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza, shot and killed 26 people
in a school in Newtown, CT.
Â
As recently as Sept 2013, an angry Democrat shot 12 at a Navy ship yard.
Â


Clearly, there is a problem with Democrats and guns. This research proves
it. Not one NRA member, Tea Party member, or Republican conservative was
involved in any of these shootings and murders.

The solution is simple: It should be illegal for Democrats to own guns. We
don't need gun control; we need Democrat control. Guns don't kill people;
Democrats do!
Winston_Smith
2015-12-14 02:49:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by raykeller
In 1963, a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy,
President of the United States.
And a Kennedy lover, tight with the mofia, strip club owner kill him.

There does, however, seem to be a few events missing.
news13
2015-12-14 13:33:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Winston_Smith
Post by raykeller
In 1963, a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy,
President of the United States.
And a Kennedy lover, tight with the mofia, strip club owner kill him.
There does, however, seem to be a few events missing.
I prefer the story that most of the secret services were hung over, so a
wanna be got to ride in the car and over reacted and shot kennedy.
lawrence glickman
2015-12-14 16:03:04 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 13:33:55 -0000 (UTC), news13
Post by news13
Post by Winston_Smith
Post by raykeller
In 1963, a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy,
President of the United States.
And a Kennedy lover, tight with the mofia, strip club owner kill him.
There does, however, seem to be a few events missing.
I prefer the story that most of the secret services were hung over, so a
wanna be got to ride in the car and over reacted and shot kennedy.
prefer to your heart's content, but the zapruder tapes show otherwise.

Lg
news13
2015-12-15 05:09:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by lawrence glickman
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 13:33:55 -0000 (UTC), news13
Post by news13
Post by Winston_Smith
Post by raykeller
In 1963, a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy,
President of the United States.
And a Kennedy lover, tight with the mofia, strip club owner kill him.
There does, however, seem to be a few events missing.
I prefer the story that most of the secret services were hung over, so a
wanna be got to ride in the car and over reacted and shot kennedy.
prefer to your heart's content, but the zapruder tapes show otherwise.
Yep, conspiracies from the ignorant are big business.
Stupidity followed by a coverup is a more credible explanation.
The guy advancing the theory has an explanation for all the "events".
Winston_Smith
2015-12-15 05:29:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by news13
Post by lawrence glickman
Post by news13
I prefer the story that most of the secret services were hung over, so a
wanna be got to ride in the car and over reacted and shot kennedy.
prefer to your heart's content, but the zapruder tapes show otherwise.
Yep, conspiracies from the ignorant are big business.
Stupidity followed by a coverup is a more credible explanation.
The guy advancing the theory has an explanation for all the "events".
Not that they were drunk/hungover or that there were substitutes, but
the Warren Commission did find the SS were up late partying and not at
their best.
Don
2015-12-15 05:38:08 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 22:29:34 -0700, Winston_Smith
Post by Winston_Smith
Post by news13
Post by lawrence glickman
Post by news13
I prefer the story that most of the secret services were hung over, so a
wanna be got to ride in the car and over reacted and shot kennedy.
prefer to your heart's content, but the zapruder tapes show otherwise.
Yep, conspiracies from the ignorant are big business.
Stupidity followed by a coverup is a more credible explanation.
The guy advancing the theory has an explanation for all the "events".
Not that they were drunk/hungover or that there were substitutes, but
the Warren Commission did find the SS were up late partying and not at
their best.
What's deliberately confusing to sheeple is that government has had
several conspiracy theories going around from the beginning.
Evidently, government agencies can employ biographers and reporters
without revealing themselves.
news13
2015-12-15 07:08:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Winston_Smith
Post by news13
Post by lawrence glickman
Post by news13
I prefer the story that most of the secret services were hung over, so
a wanna be got to ride in the car and over reacted and shot kennedy.
prefer to your heart's content, but the zapruder tapes show otherwise.
Yep, conspiracies from the ignorant are big business.
Stupidity followed by a coverup is a more credible explanation.
The guy advancing the theory has an explanation for all the "events".
Not that they were drunk/hungover or that there were substitutes, but
the Warren Commission did find the SS were up late partying and not at
their best.
It was some ex detective who looked at all again and come up with the
fact that the guy who stands up wasn't suppossed to be there as he didn't
have the skills and training. No safety on, rest follows.

PaxPerPoten
2015-12-14 03:39:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by raykeller
Gun Use Research
Â
In 1865, a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United
States.
Â
In 1881, a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the
United States - who later died from the wound.
Â
In 1963, a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy,
President of the United States.
Â
In 1975, a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President
of the United States.
Â
In 1983, a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan, President of
the United States.
Â
In 1984, James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 22 people in
a McDonalds restaurant.
Â
In 1986, Patrick Sherrill, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 15 people
in an Oklahoma post office.
Â
In 1990, James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 10 people at a
GMAC office.
Â
In 1991, George Hennard, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 23 people
in a Luby's cafeteria in Killeen, TX.
Â
In 1995, James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 5
coworkers in a Texas laboratory.
Â
In 1999, Larry Asbrook, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 8 people at
a church service.
Â
In 2001, a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a
failed attempt to kill President George W. Bush.
Â
In 2003, Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people
at a Lockheed-Martin plant.
Â
In 2007, a registered Democrat named Seung-Hui Cho, shot and killed 32
people at Virginia Tech.
Â
In 2010, a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner, shot
Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.
Â
In 2011, a registered Democrat named James Holmes, went into a movie theater
and shot and killed 12 people.
Â
In 2012, Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7
people in Minneapolis.
Â
In 2013, a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza, shot and killed 26 people
in a school in Newtown, CT.
Â
As recently as Sept 2013, an angry Democrat shot 12 at a Navy ship yard.
Â
Clearly, there is a problem with Democrats and guns. This research proves
it. Not one NRA member, Tea Party member, or Republican conservative was
involved in any of these shootings and murders.
The solution is simple: It should be illegal for Democrats to own guns. We
don't need gun control; we need Democrat control. Guns don't kill people;
Democrats do!
A simple fix. Outlaw Democrats!
--
It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard
the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all
ages who mean to govern well, but *They mean to govern*. They promise to
be good masters, *but they mean to be masters*. Daniel Webster
Mr. B1ack
2015-12-14 14:57:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by PaxPerPoten
Post by raykeller
Gun Use Research
Â
In 1865, a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United
States.
Â
In 1881, a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the
United States - who later died from the wound.
Â
In 1963, a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy,
President of the United States.
Â
In 1975, a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President
of the United States.
Â
In 1983, a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan, President of
the United States.
Â
In 1984, James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 22 people in
a McDonalds restaurant.
Â
In 1986, Patrick Sherrill, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 15 people
in an Oklahoma post office.
Â
In 1990, James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 10 people at a
GMAC office.
Â
In 1991, George Hennard, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 23 people
in a Luby's cafeteria in Killeen, TX.
Â
In 1995, James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 5
coworkers in a Texas laboratory.
Â
In 1999, Larry Asbrook, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 8 people at
a church service.
Â
In 2001, a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a
failed attempt to kill President George W. Bush.
Â
In 2003, Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people
at a Lockheed-Martin plant.
Â
In 2007, a registered Democrat named Seung-Hui Cho, shot and killed 32
people at Virginia Tech.
Â
In 2010, a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner, shot
Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.
Â
In 2011, a registered Democrat named James Holmes, went into a movie theater
and shot and killed 12 people.
Â
In 2012, Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7
people in Minneapolis.
Â
In 2013, a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza, shot and killed 26 people
in a school in Newtown, CT.
Â
As recently as Sept 2013, an angry Democrat shot 12 at a Navy ship yard.
Â
Clearly, there is a problem with Democrats and guns. This research proves
it. Not one NRA member, Tea Party member, or Republican conservative was
involved in any of these shootings and murders.
The solution is simple: It should be illegal for Democrats to own guns. We
don't need gun control; we need Democrat control. Guns don't kill people;
Democrats do!
A simple fix. Outlaw Democrats!
Hmm ... well, you could declare leftism a proven
threat to national security (and sanity) I suppose ...
but I don't want to inflate our prison budget either.

The Socialist Paradise Of Canada seems all proud
about accepting refugees .... so just deport 'em there.
I'm sure they can find high-paying jobs micromanaging
everything Canadians do/say/think in their daily lives :-)
someone else
2015-12-14 16:23:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by PaxPerPoten
Post by raykeller
The solution is simple: It should be illegal for Democrats to own guns. We
don't need gun control; we need Democrat control. Guns don't kill people;
Democrats do!
A simple fix. Outlaw Democrats!
Hmm ... well, you could declare leftism a proven
threat to national security (and sanity) I suppose ...
Someone else might think that you are inciting an insurrection based
upon right wing cultist propaganda, which might be considered treasonous



Their rhetoric about guns is another topic where they’re completely
irrational. Our Second Amendment literally has the words “well
regulated” written in it, yet they oppose pretty much any attempt to
“well regulate” guns in the United States. Never mind the fact that
tighter regulations on firearms wouldn’t impact a single law-abiding
(and mentally sound) American citizen. The reality is, they’ve fallen
victim to the fear-mongering propaganda that’s been pushed by the NRA at
the behest of the big gun and ammo lobbies. They’ve become so absurd
that one of their go-to catch phrases – “the only way to stop a bad guy
with a gun is a good guy with a gun” – quite literally says that the
only way we can stop a “bad guy” is by letting them shoot and/or kill at
least one victim before that “bad guy” can be identified and stopped by
the “good guy.” Just think about this for a moment. If someone is armed
to the teeth with a Glock holstered to their hip and an AK-47 strapped
to their back, and someone with a pistol walking right behind them
decides to pull out their gun and fire three rounds into the back of
that AK-47 toting individual’s head, how did guns protect them? All they
ultimately ended up with is a very well armed corpse, whose murderer may
or may not be “stopped by a good guy with a gun.” The only way to stop
bad guys with guns is to do everything we can to make sure criminals and
the mentally unstable don’t get them. We can pass strict gun laws in
this country and still have a nation where tens of millions of
law-abiding and mentally sound Americans have guns. But you can’t even
begin to have that discussion in a reasonable manner because most
Republicans are completely incapable of being reasonable when it comes
to guns. Then there are the Bible-thumpers. You know, the people who
seem to validate their Christianity by their church attendance.



http://www.forwardprogressives.com/guns-god-bullsht-real-truth-republican-party/
max headroom
2015-12-15 01:53:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by someone else
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by PaxPerPoten
Post by raykeller
The solution is simple: It should be illegal for Democrats to own guns. We
don't need gun control; we need Democrat control. Guns don't kill people;
Democrats do!
A simple fix. Outlaw Democrats!
Hmm ... well, you could declare leftism a proven
threat to national security (and sanity) I suppose ...
Someone else might think that you are inciting an insurrection based
upon right wing cultist propaganda, which might be considered treasonous
Someone else might be deluded.
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...